To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 10823
10822  |  10824
Subject: 
Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:40:00 GMT
Viewed: 
1106 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
Why *side* with either?

I'll do as I please.

As you should. I asked in order to try to understand, not challenge, your view.

I'm glad my "elaboration" was helpful, and I hope I am clear now.

<snipped discussion>

I did say it, but not just to you, rather to all who read here. I'll say it
again...
Welcome all who come, whatever their reason for being part of the hobby even
if you don't personally dig it, as long as no harm comes of it. We need more
tolerance. More MOCing and less mocking, to steal a line from someone.

Sounds good to me, but why do you feel it is necessary to repeat yourself?
Are you sure you are not addressing me? Have I mocked someone or done
something I am not aware of?

I think James B put his finger on the disconnect nicely. It's about paradigm
shifts. Being in the middle and enjoying both, I have a harder time
understanding the extreme view of someone who actively dislikes collectors
(not you, Dan, mind you, you did not say that you did, but others have in
the past) as well as the extreme view of someone who gets upset if a builder
opens a set (that he purchased fair and square and thus should be able to do
what he pleases with his property).

Not that I disagree, but again you've tagged this sentiment in reply to my
post. Perhaps there is an unpleasant history behind this topic that I am not
aware of, since I am a relative newcomer. Your tone seems to reflect a
desire to prevent another rehashing of the arguements before. Let me assure
you that I am not interested in putting things on a petty level or "actively
disliking" anyone. I will admit that I am not fond of materialistic or
greedy people in life, in general. Materialism and egocentricism reflects a
shallow mentality, in my opinion, and I have little esteem for people who
cling to and showcase their purchases and possessions. I don't act or intend
to be judgemental but if people feel otherwise, so be it, I won't "shift" my
paradigm in this regard.

Dan



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable
 
(...) You said "whatever", suggesting that you didn't agree. I restated it in hopes that you would clarify if you do or don't agree that inclusiveness is good. (...) Not that you disagree with what? (...) Great, (aside from the loaded words) but I (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable
 
(...) As you should. I asked in order to try to understand, not challenge, your view. <snip elaboration> Thanks. Helpful. (...) I did say it, but not just to you, rather to all who read here. I'll say it again... Welcome all who come, whatever their (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

65 Messages in This Thread:

























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR