Subject:
|
Re: Misnomer: we are all Lego collectors!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 11 Jun 2001 23:26:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
919 times
|
| |
|
|
Nevermind, because you don't hold Lego in high regard.
It is a good collectable. Your not winning any admiration here by saying
that it's not.
Perhaps you have'nt seen my Creations.
www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?m=Legomaster
Also, your forgetting that every year additional sets are added or new theme
sets are added to the product line. So sets go extinct. Making them
collectable. Pieces have a rarity to them if you don't know that.....
It really bugs me that you over looked this and how you simplified what ever
the heck it was you were saying about sets and parts and making them from
others.
And I'm the Legomaster! where do you get off Questioning me!
I want to see pix of what you made!
And trust me that's about as rough as I have ever gotten on Lugnet ever.
Freinds.
Legomaster
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Eric Sophie writes:
> > ---- See Below
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> > > In any case, my point stands: I might be termed a collector of Lego, but
> > > Lego itself is a poor collectable.
> > >
> > > Bruce
> >
> > ----In the sense that it isn't easy or TLC never made it easy to collect
> > Lego, I agree.
> >
> > Eric
>
> No, in the sense of what makes something a good collectable. That is
> usually uniqueness and to some degree, scarcity. Unless there is a specific
> unique part in the set, Lego rates real low on that scale (primarily the
> box). You can find any given piece in another set (for the most part), and
> the piece can often be found for sale separate from the set. Thus the set
> itself can be duplicated without actually being it as a set. Further, the
> value of Lego itself increases to the buyer by (horror of horrors) mixing it
> with other sets!
>
> Note the Guarded Inn is both scarce and has unique parts and has/had a
> "collectable" price.
>
> Now, this doesn't stop people from collecting Lego and keeping it in
> unopened pristine condition - some do - but I didn't say that you couldn't
> treat it as a collectable, just that it makes a poor collectable.
>
> Bruce
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Misnomer: we are all Lego collectors!
|
| (...) Why do you say this? Because Bruce doesn't have the same opinion as you? (...) What do your creations have to do with the debate at hand? (...) Um, what? (...) What does this have to do with anything? How does one person's creations and the (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Misnomer: we are all Lego collectors!
|
| (...) No, in the sense of what makes something a good collectable. That is usually uniqueness and to some degree, scarcity. Unless there is a specific unique part in the set, Lego rates real low on that scale (primarily the box). You can find any (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
65 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
