To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 10809
10808  |  10810
Subject: 
Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 12 Jun 2001 18:40:54 GMT
Viewed: 
1072 times
  
That's good, I can go with that...

Eric


In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Daniel Jassim writes:
I'm making assumptions of course, but my point is
that it goes both ways, though I side with the builders.

Why *side* with either?

Why are there sides *at all* for that matter?

That is what is baffling me. This isn't a territorial war, is it? Both
"sides" can "win", can't they?

I'm a builder AND a collector and there is nothing wrong with being both. I
have MISB sets I enjoy for their MISB-ness and other copies of the same sets
that I get down and play with on the rug.

This is a big tent. Welcome all who come, whatever their reason, as long as
it is without malice aforethought.

++Lar



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable
 
(...) Why *side* with either? Why are there sides *at all* for that matter? That is what is baffling me. This isn't a territorial war, is it? Both "sides" can "win", can't they? I'm a builder AND a collector and there is nothing wrong with being (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

65 Messages in This Thread:

























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR