| |
In lugnet.castle, Jimmy Park writes:
> I think your definition of a collector is fundamentally wrong.
> Now, I also collect action figures. In that hobby (as well as the larger
> field of toy collecting), certain terms already have a set meaning, such >as collectors, scalpers, etc. A person who collects
> Barbie dolls is a Barbie collector. Nothing wrong with being a collector,
> but I do think it's wrong to try and stigmatize/change the definition of the
> word.
So...I'm confused...Are you saying that if I was to buy Barbie dolls, and
cut their hair off, I'd be a scalper? Is that right? 8->
Matt (Just moving this to .debate)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Misnomer: we are all Lego collectors!
|
| (...) I think your definition of a collector is fundamentally wrong. Webster's defines a collector as one that collects or a person who makes a collection. No where does it mention that one has to have every set in a series to be a collector or does (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
65 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
