Subject:
|
Re: Misnomer: we are all Lego collectors!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 11 Jun 2001 22:54:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
795 times
|
| |
|
|
---- See Below
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> In any case, my point stands: I might be termed a collector of Lego, but
> Lego itself is a poor collectable.
>
> Bruce
----In the sense that it isn't easy or TLC never made it easy to collect
Lego, I agree.
Eric
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Misnomer: we are all Lego collectors!
|
| (...) No, in the sense of what makes something a good collectable. That is usually uniqueness and to some degree, scarcity. Unless there is a specific unique part in the set, Lego rates real low on that scale (primarily the box). You can find any (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Misnomer: we are all Lego collectors!
|
| (...) Note where my message is on the tree - I hadn't read the "cites" I anticipated someone would use at that point. The dictionary terms don't really apply to the "collectable toy" market, which is what is really being debated (anything else is a (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
65 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
