To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.market.auctionOpen lugnet.market.auction in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Marketplace / Auctions / 1340
1339  |  1341
Subject: 
Re: ng for auction technologies/theory?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Fri, 23 Apr 1999 03:04:50 GMT
Viewed: 
928 times
  
In lugnet.market.auction, Todd Lehman writes:
Market theory could include algorithms, etc. but my initial reaction is
- What makes an auction good, just, fair, well run - it turns into an
ethical discussion for me - although that might not be a bad topic for
here either.

Is that a case in favor of .market.theory or in favor of .market.tech?  In
my mind, ethical issues fit much more closely with what .market.theory means
but not so much with what .market.tech* means, so ethics would be a case in
favor .market.theory to me.

I agree that .theory is too narrow. What about market.techniques? To me that
would seem to encompass the theory aspect to a certain extent as well as the
use of technology. Anyone can discuss tips on what/where/how/when to buy/sell.
I had thought of the group .methods, but that sounds too much like .theory.

My $0.02.

-Tom McD.
when replying please outbid the spamcake.



Message is in Reply To:
  ng for auction technologies/theory?
 
(...) Is that a case in favor of .market.theory or in favor of .market.tech? In my mind, ethical issues fit much more closely with what .market.theory means but not so much with what .market.tech* means, so ethics would be a case in favor (...) (25 years ago, 23-Apr-99, to lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.admin.general)

96 Messages in This Thread:















































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR