To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 2823
2822  |  2824
Subject: 
Re: LDraw.org Bylaws - new proposed clauses
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Wed, 4 Feb 2004 18:20:46 GMT
Viewed: 
2361 times
  
Tim Courtney wrote:

[Section 6.02: Eligibility for LEGO Company Employees]¬

What about MegaBloks, or any other company that may have an interest? Why
pointing the finger on TLC only?

Why not have a more general clause about conflict of interest?

--
Anders Isaksson, Sweden
BlockCAD:  http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/proglego.htm
Gallery:   http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/gallery/index.htm



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: LDraw.org Bylaws - new proposed clauses
 
(...) I don't think we could list which companies to watch out for, and which not to, and be comprehensive. That's why there's a general removal clause in 6.04 to enable the members to remove a SteerCo member in cases of documented, serious (...) (21 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  LDraw.org Bylaws - new proposed clauses
 
Thanks to everyone who has been participating in the bylaws discussion. These are important issues, and in my view the opinions put forth have been by and large well thought out and productive. I think we've covered the lion's share of the possible (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)

68 Messages in This Thread:





















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR