To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 2777
2776  |  2778
Subject: 
Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 21:14:41 GMT
Viewed: 
2638 times
  
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:11:37PM +0000, Tim Courtney wrote:
The only change made between the last posting of the document to the
mail list and the posting here was in the clause Jacob addressed.
Jacob's edits still leave some ambiguity - is that what we want? If in
the future there is a candidate who's eligibility is questioned, who
makes the final decision for eligibility?

Jacob said:

  "No professional employee of The LEGO? Company or any affiliated
  or subsidiary company shall be eligible to be a Steering
  Committee Officer."

Is the ambiguity in the word "professional"?  Ok, so if we say "No
employee of TLC..." does that correct the problem?

--
Dan Boger
dan@peeron.com



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
 
(...) No, the point is to make a distinction between employees who have influence on strategy decisions within the company, and low-level employees who do not. Example, I currently work part time at a LEGO store, while attending school. I'm not (...) (21 years ago, 28-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
  Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
 
(...) part-time, student, non-career, professional, careerist ,steering committee, fellow member, active member ... there is a german saying: den wald vor lauter bäumen nicht sehen (not spotting the forest because of too many trees ;-) I remember (...) (21 years ago, 31-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
 
(...) The only change made between the last posting of the document to the mail list and the posting here was in the clause Jacob addressed. Jacob's edits still leave some ambiguity - is that what we want? If in the future there is a candidate who's (...) (21 years ago, 28-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

68 Messages in This Thread:





















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR