Subject:
|
Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 05:31:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2977 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney wrote:
>
> I think Larry's wording made sense, but maybe people are getting tripped up on
> reading it in the sentence structure. What if we reworked it to read:
>
> "No professional employee of The LEGO? Company or any affiliated or subsidiary
> company shall be eligible to be a Steering Committee Officer. A 'professional
> employee' is defined as; a full-time, career employee, involved firsthand in
> strategy decisions within the Company. Part-time, student, or non-career intern
> employees shall be eligible to be Steering Committee Officers."
That reads better to me.
> Also, should we add in a mechanism for determining eligibility (ie. the current
> StC votes if there are questions about a candidate being eligibile)? Or, is the
> above wording clear enough that we don't need that?
Well maybe we need such a mechanism anyway, in case other unknown conflicts or
questions arise in future?
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
68 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
