Subject:
|
Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:17:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2764 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
> Willy Tschager wrote:
> > In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Dan Boger wrote:
>
> > > "No professional employee of The LEGO? Company or any
> > > affiliated or subsidiary company shall be eligible to
> > > be a Steering Committee Officer."
> > >
> > > Is the ambiguity in the word "professional"? Ok, so if
> > > we say "No employee of TLC..." does that correct the
> > > problem?
>
> > itlug.org (italian lego® users group) has solved this
> > problem in a (you might call it radical) simple way.
> > people who pay their bills with money they got from the
> > company can't get a ruling position, ‘cos any kind of
> > employees can't even be members: we or them.
>
> That (both the itlug and Dan's solutions) is definitely a
> nice and easy solution.
>
> The problem here is that Tim would like to keep his job at
> LEGO and have a go at being on the LDraw.org steering
> committee.
>
> Since I don't know what Tim's position at LEGO is, I can't
> say if I find that a problem or not.
I'm a sales associate at a Brand Retail store, part-time.
> But if the general view in Europe is that LEGO staff
> shouldn't be allowed to be members of the LUG's, then I can
> see that we have a problem to solve. Do you think it would
> be acceptable if LEGO staff was allowed as non-voting
> members?
I don't see a conflict with my current job description. Like Larry, I say let it
be a campaign issue. That seems to me the simplest solution.
-Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
68 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
