Subject:
|
Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 3 Feb 2004 08:24:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3019 times
|
| |
|
|
Dan Boger wrote:
> Tim Courtney wrote:
> > I think before we take the step of creating a poll, we
> > should allow this discussion here to flesh itself out
> > and see if we come to a consensus.
I think the views are so different that it is unlikely that
we can reach a consensus. There may be a majority for
either of the two opinions, but I doubt it will be possible
general agreement about what is the right solution.
> > That process has worked well before. No one except you
> > has explicitly disagreed to omitting the clause Larry
> > suggested - so I think its good to ask outright - does
> > anyone else disagree? Does anyone care to offer another
> > solution?
>
> I think the point isn't if someone can influence TLC
> policy, but if they can influence LDraw's policy.
Uhm. Right. I hadn't quite had that thought before.
> In my opinion, if you get a paycheck from LEGO, you might
> have a conflict of interest.
Definitely.
Play well,
Jacob
--
Bregnerod Transit Authority - Moving mini-figs:
http://jacob.sparre.dk/BTA/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
68 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
