To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 2787
2786  |  2788
Subject: 
Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:59:12 GMT
Viewed: 
3148 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
Larry Pieniazek wrote:

We seem to be making something convoluted in this area no
matter what we do...

Yes.

Here's a radical idea... drop the clause completely. If
someone stands for election that has a conflict of
interest that would hinder their carrying out their
duties, let that be a campaign issue. Let the bylaws say
nothing at all about it.

I wouldn't call it radical (I thought about it too).  I
think it is the most practical solution.

I can go with this solution also. Headed off to work for now, but I'll be back
with this thread sometime this weekend to re-post the drafts.

Ratification will take place once technical concerns have been addressed.

-Tim



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
 
(...) Yes. (...) I wouldn't call it radical (I thought about it too). I think it is the most practical solution. Play well, Jacob (21 years ago, 30-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

68 Messages in This Thread:





















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR