Subject:
|
Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 08:05:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2700 times
|
| |
|
|
Willy Tschager wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Dan Boger wrote:
> > "No professional employee of The LEGO? Company or any
> > affiliated or subsidiary company shall be eligible to
> > be a Steering Committee Officer."
> >
> > Is the ambiguity in the word "professional"? Ok, so if
> > we say "No employee of TLC..." does that correct the
> > problem?
> itlug.org (italian lego® users group) has solved this
> problem in a (you might call it radical) simple way.
> people who pay their bills with money they got from the
> company can't get a ruling position, ‘cos any kind of
> employees can't even be members: we or them.
That (both the itlug and Dan's solutions) is definitely a
nice and easy solution.
The problem here is that Tim would like to keep his job at
LEGO and have a go at being on the LDraw.org steering
committee.
Since I don't know what Tim's position at LEGO is, I can't
say if I find that a problem or not. And I think it is
really more in LEGO's interest than in LDraw.org's interest
to formalise that LEGO doesn't control LDraw.org. After
all; what damage could LEGO do by having somebody on the
LDraw.org steering committee?
But if the general view in Europe is that LEGO staff
shouldn't be allowed to be members of the LUG's, then I can
see that we have a problem to solve. Do you think it would
be acceptable if LEGO staff was allowed as non-voting
members?
Jacob
--
"The current state of knowledge can be summarised thus:
In the beginning, there was nothing, which exploded."
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
68 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
