Subject:
|
Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 21:28:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8036 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Dan Boger wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:11:37PM +0000, Tim Courtney wrote:
> > The only change made between the last posting of the document to the
> > mail list and the posting here was in the clause Jacob addressed.
> > Jacob's edits still leave some ambiguity - is that what we want? If in
> > the future there is a candidate who's eligibility is questioned, who
> > makes the final decision for eligibility?
>
> Jacob said:
>
> "No professional employee of The LEGO? Company or any affiliated
> or subsidiary company shall be eligible to be a Steering
> Committee Officer."
>
> Is the ambiguity in the word "professional"? Ok, so if we say "No
> employee of TLC..." does that correct the problem?
No, the point is to make a distinction between employees who have influence on
strategy decisions within the company, and low-level employees who do not.
Example, I currently work part time at a LEGO store, while attending school. I'm
not involved with strategy decisions, and to make such a blanket statement in
the bylaws would disallow me as a candidate to the Steering Committee.
I have the support of several community members to stand for election. I don't
believe my position in the Company is any conflict of interest to LDraw.org.
However, in the future, should I advance, it might pose a conflict - and at that
time my involvement on the Committee should be re-evaluated.
-Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
68 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
