Subject:
|
Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 05:14:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3129 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney wrote:
> Please feed back on this, and once it is worked out I will word it into the
> bylaws and repost. Or -- I would very much appreciate it if someone else would
> take it upon themselves to suggest wording (but not necessary, of course) :-)
We seem to be making something convoluted in this area no matter what we do...
Here's a radical idea... drop the clause completely. If someone stands for
election that has a conflict of interest that would hinder their carrying out
their duties, let that be a campaign issue. Let the bylaws say nothing at all
about it.
I put that idea out there to see what people think. I think if people see it as
a workable alternative, it does seem to solve the problem though.
ILTCO chose to have such a clause limiting eligibility, which is where this
clause came from in the first place, but maybe ILTCO shouldn't have had it.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
68 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
