Subject:
|
Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Draft
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 11:31:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2113 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, James Reynolds wrote:
| |
My point is that having a well defined organization with a built in mechanism
for discussion and making command decisions is an awesome thing to have.
|
Well put!
| |
I think one year is too short a term for steering committee members. Are
there that many LDraw people who would be able to be a steering committe
member? That is like 100 people for 10 years (and hasn’t it almost been 10
years since LDraw first came out?). And what about serving multiple terms?
I don’t remember seeing anything about that (maybe I skimmed over that?).
|
Typically if there is no explicit bar, the interpretation is that multiple terms
are OK. That could be added if it’s really unclear.
As to the term length, ILTCO went with 2 year terms for the executive committee
for reasons similar to those you allude to. Now is the time to decide if it
needs to be changed. I’m not opposed to longer terms for the Ldraw.org
organization but I’m not convinced we have such a dearth of candidates or major
continuity problems looming that it’s needful, so I’d be fine either way.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Draft
|
| I think this is a good thing and would really turn LDraw into a machine that gets more things done. I've been heavily involved with Mac OS X Labs Org ((URL) for the last year. The steering committee for that group has had weekly conference calls and (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
68 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
