To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 2800
2799  |  2801
Subject: 
Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Tue, 3 Feb 2004 01:35:08 GMT
Viewed: 
3157 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Orion Pobursky wrote:
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Dan Boger wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 07:16:41PM +0000, Tim Courtney wrote:
I think before we take the step of creating a poll, we should allow
this discussion here to flesh itself out and see if we come to a
consensus. That process has worked well before. No one except you has
explicitly disagreed to omitting the clause Larry suggested - so I
think its good to ask outright - does anyone else disagree? Does
anyone care to offer another solution?

I object, for the record.  I think the point isn't if someone can
influence TLC policy, but if they can influence LDraw's policy.  In my
optinion, if you get a paycheck from LEGO, you might have a conflict of
interest.

Ok, but at what point does a conflict of interect exist?  Do we really need to
exclude every worker simply because membership from a small subset poses a
conflict of interest?

I strongly object to a blanket exclusion. I do not believe every position would
pose a conflict of interest.

Here is a thought: What about instead of having an exclusionary clause, require
that if someone is employed by TLC, there be disclosure of that person's
employment status on LDraw.org x amount of time prior to the election? Require a
footnote to be added to the final list of nominees and/or ballot that notes who
is employed by TLC, what their title is, and a summary of their responsibilities
and powers.

Make measures to ensure the community is reasonably informed, and then let the
community decide on a case-by-case basis who they trust to lead LDraw.org.

-Tim



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
 
(...) This is the best I can come up with: Any person who works in a retail outlet (including kiosks, mall stores, and theme park centers) from the store manager position down or any worker in manufacturing, shipping, or goundskeeping/housekeeping (...) (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
 
(...) Ok, but at what point does a conflict of interect exist? Do we really need to exclude every worker simply because membership from a small subset poses a conflict of interest? -Orion (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

68 Messages in This Thread:





















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR