LDraw (www.ldraw.org) : 2786


CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 2786	2785 \| 2787

Subject:	Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date:	Fri, 30 Jan 2004 08:17:23 GMT
Viewed:	2864 times

Larry Pieniazek wrote: > We seem to be making something convoluted in this area no > matter what we do... Yes. > Here's a radical idea... drop the clause completely. If > someone stands for election that has a conflict of > interest that would hinder their carrying out their > duties, let that be a campaign issue. Let the bylaws say > nothing at all about it. I wouldn't call it radical (I thought about it too). I think it is the most practical solution. Play well, Jacob -- Jacob's LEGO aircraft: http://jacob.sparre.dk/LEGO/Transport/Fly/

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) I can go with this solution also. Headed off to work for now, but I'll be back with this thread sometime this weekend to re-post the drafts. Ratification will take place once technical concerns have been addressed. -Tim (20 years ago, 30-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) We seem to be making something convoluted in this area no matter what we do... Here's a radical idea... drop the clause completely. If someone stands for election that has a conflict of interest that would hinder their carrying out their (...) (20 years ago, 30-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

68 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search