Subject:
|
Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 22:04:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3066 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Dan Boger wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 07:16:41PM +0000, Tim Courtney wrote:
> > I think before we take the step of creating a poll, we should allow
> > this discussion here to flesh itself out and see if we come to a
> > consensus. That process has worked well before. No one except you has
> > explicitly disagreed to omitting the clause Larry suggested - so I
> > think its good to ask outright - does anyone else disagree? Does
> > anyone care to offer another solution?
>
> I object, for the record. I think the point isn't if someone can
> influence TLC policy, but if they can influence LDraw's policy. In my
> optinion, if you get a paycheck from LEGO, you might have a conflict of
> interest.
Ok, but at what point does a conflict of interect exist? Do we really need to
exclude every worker simply because membership from a small subset poses a
conflict of interest?
-Orion
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
68 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
