Subject:
|
Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 Dec 1999 17:13:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1666 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> Shiri wrote:
>
> > > I think most of us would be delighted to live a bit longer than we • currently
> > > think is what's achievable. I myself could easily see wanting to go 200 • years.
> >
> > Not to insult or something, but being immortal is much more than 200 years.
> > It's for eternity. If you can't grasp eternity, think 1 million years. • (which
> > is nothing compared to eternity.)
>
> Not to insult or something but I didn't say that immortality was the
> same thing as living for 200 years, I merely said that I could easily
> see wanting to go 200 years and that I would like to have a choice about
> how long to live rather than a fixed end point.
That makes your point clearer. In that case, I agree.
> > P.S. Wow, that was a serious letter! Sorry if I over-whelmed you. I think I
> > over-whelmed myself. :-)
>
> c /over-whelmed/overwhelmed/ OR use whelmed in a sentence by itself.
> :-) I imagine you are E2L but in english, one only hyphenates words that
> can stand alone and sometimes not even then.
Yes, I am E2L (or ESL), and thanks for the tip.
-Shiri
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
86 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
