Subject:
|
Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Mon, 27 Dec 1999 22:07:36 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
JOHNNEAL@USWESTihatespam.NET
|
Viewed:
|
915 times
|
| |
|
|
Richard Marchetti wrote:
> Fellow Lugnuts:
>
> I just had the good fortune/misfortune to receive 6095, 6094, and 6032 as Xmas
> gifts. I am not going to review these sets except in a cursory way. The gist
> of this post is to complain on behalf of new castle buyers -- that new castle
> sucks!
<snip rant>
Richard, you need to take a deep breath. If you don't like the sets, why not
combine them to create some MOCs? Not many sets TLC produces are worth keeping
assembled, so what's new? You have been given the tools. Use them. Until I
hear Robert Carney complain about the new castles, I will assume they have
*potential*.
-John
>
>
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
|
| John Neal wrote in message <3867E320.9F89033F@u...st.net>... (...) Xmas (...) gist (...) castle (...) not (...) keeping (...) I (...) I haven't heard the Grand Master's opinion yet, either, but personally I have no complaints at all! Most of these (...) (25 years ago, 28-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | New Castle Sucks (so far...)
|
| Fellow Lugnuts: I just had the good fortune/misfortune to receive 6095, 6094, and 6032 as Xmas gifts. I am not going to review these sets except in a cursory way. The gist of this post is to complain on behalf of new castle buyers -- that new castle (...) (25 years ago, 27-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
86 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
