To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3129
3128  |  3130
Subject: 
Re: Bicentennial Man and Immortality (was Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sun, 2 Jan 2000 01:57:24 GMT
Viewed: 
976 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
You seem to know a lot about that which is unknowable;-)

He's also assuming that an omnipotent being is restricted by logic.
Self-contradictory, neh?
:)

James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
Jasper Janssen wrote:


The only possible way for an immortal creature to kill itself would be
if it were also omnipotent. If god is all-powerful, can he create a
stone he cannot lift? The answer: Assuming the laws of logic hold,
omnipotence and another invincible force cannot exist in the same
universe. Silly answer: The christian god isn't bound by the laws of
logic.

So since you're immortal, you're not omnipotent, so you can't kill

yourself. QED.


Jasper



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Bicentennial Man and Immortality (was Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
 
You seem to know a lot about that which is unknowable;-) -John (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

86 Messages in This Thread:


































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR