To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3129
3128  |  3130
Subject: 
Re: Bicentennial Man and Immortality (was Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sun, 2 Jan 2000 01:57:24 GMT
Viewed: 
2069 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> You seem to know a lot about that which is unknowable;-)

He's also assuming that an omnipotent being is restricted by logic.
Self-contradictory, neh?
:)

James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
> Jasper Janssen wrote:
> 
> > 
> > The only possible way for an immortal creature to kill itself would be
> > if it were also omnipotent. If god is all-powerful, can he create a
> > stone he cannot lift? The answer: Assuming the laws of logic hold,
> > omnipotence and another invincible force cannot exist in the same
> > universe. Silly answer: The christian god isn't bound by the laws of
> > logic.
> 
> > So since you're immortal, you're not omnipotent, so you can't kill
> 
> > yourself. QED.
> 
> > 
> > Jasper



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Bicentennial Man and Immortality (was Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
 
You seem to know a lot about that which is unknowable;-) -John (...) (27 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

86 Messages in This Thread:


































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR