Subject:
|
Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Wed, 29 Dec 1999 05:38:15 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
johnneal@uswestNOSPAM.net
|
Viewed:
|
1576 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.fun, John Neal writes:
> >
> >
> > James Brown wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > You don't know that I'm mortal, you only have precedent to work with.
> >
> > I wonder....would an immortal end a sentence with a preposition?
>
> Quite. That, quoting Churchill, is something "up with which I will not put"...
>
> > -John
> >
> > > I
> > > certainly intend to live forever. :)
>
> Saw Bicentennial Man today, it made me cry. A lot. Here's a question for you:
>
> Would you give up practical immortality in order to be officially recognised as
> "human", given that you already were, for all intents and purposes?
Por moi? I will reserve judgment on Bi-man until I see it tomorrow or Thurs, but
my initial reaction from trailers is that this whole topic was dealt with quite
elegantly in ST:TNG with the character of Data. The author of Ecclesiastes was
certainly correct when he said, "There is nothing new under the Sun".
I don't quite understand your question, but I can see the Christ inferences
forming already.... BTW, did everyone catch all of the Christology in "Matrix"?
-John
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
86 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
