To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 3900
3899  |  3901
Subject: 
Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Wed, 29 Dec 1999 17:33:51 GMT
Reply-To: 
johnneal@uswest.netAVOIDSPAM
Viewed: 
1601 times
  
Mr L F Braun wrote:

Larry Pieniazek wrote:

In lugnet.off-topic.fun, John Neal writes:
James Brown wrote:


You don't know that I'm mortal, you only have precedent to work with.

I wonder....would an immortal end a sentence with a preposition?

Quite. That, quoting Churchill, is something "up with which I will not put"...

The "rule" about prepositions ending sentences is an archaic Victorianism, an
effort to "Latinize" English.  Since English is a Germanic language, and German has
prepositions at the end of sentences all of the time (separable prefixes and all
that), as does Dutch, there's no reason why we can't do it too.  The rule about "no
split infinitives" is from the same stupid era of haughty stylistics, not to
mention just dumb, because once you "split" an infinitive, it's not an infinitive
anymore--"to" becomes a different part of speech.


It basically boils down to this:  if you give in on prepositions, then before you know
it, we will be saying "ain't", "chilrun", and "me and her went".  It's about
preserving the language from the illiterates, who are legion.  Don't get me started on
Ebonics...

-John



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
 
(...) What part of speech would it be then, exactly? (...) That's not really a strong argument, because why should the "literate" minority hold sway over the masses? Seems kind of elitist to me. Further, that slippery-slope reasoning is inherently (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
  Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
 
(...) "We" (who?) already are saying those things, statistically. We just shouldn't write them. What do you mean, "giving in?" This isn't even an issue of grammatical correctness--it's an issue of style. There is no rule in English that prohibits (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
 
(...) The "rule" about prepositions ending sentences is an archaic Victorianism, an effort to "Latinize" English. Since English is a Germanic language, and German has prepositions at the end of sentences all of the time (separable prefixes and all (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

86 Messages in This Thread:


































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR