To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 3891
3890  |  3892
Subject: 
Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Wed, 29 Dec 1999 09:38:39 GMT
Viewed: 
1548 times
  
Larry Pieniazek wrote:

In lugnet.off-topic.fun, John Neal writes:
James Brown wrote:


You don't know that I'm mortal, you only have precedent to work with.

I wonder....would an immortal end a sentence with a preposition?

Quite. That, quoting Churchill, is something "up with which I will not put"...

The "rule" about prepositions ending sentences is an archaic Victorianism, an
effort to "Latinize" English.  Since English is a Germanic language, and German has
prepositions at the end of sentences all of the time (separable prefixes and all
that), as does Dutch, there's no reason why we can't do it too.  The rule about "no
split infinitives" is from the same stupid era of haughty stylistics, not to
mention just dumb, because once you "split" an infinitive, it's not an infinitive
anymore--"to" becomes a different part of speech.

-John

I
certainly intend to live forever. :)

Saw Bicentennial Man today, it made me cry. A lot. Here's a question for you:

Would you give up practical immortality in order to be officially recognised as
"human", given that you already were, for all intents and purposes?

I'm really looking forward to seeing the movie.  The first time I read the story
(It was first an Asimov short story in the 1960 or 1970s, by the way) it was very
profound.  I only hope they haven't cluttered the basic premise too heavily with
cheap sentimentality and gimmicky laughs...have they?

best,

Lindsay



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
 
(...) "the Positronic Man" is credited in the opening credits as the basis. (...) Very few gimmicky laughs. One that *I* laughed at was the display of the 3 laws (quoted word for word from Asimov) in the very beginning. As for sentimentality, I (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
  Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
 
(...) It basically boils down to this: if you give in on prepositions, then before you know it, we will be saying "ain't", "chilrun", and "me and her went". It's about preserving the language from the illiterates, who are legion. Don't get me (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
 
(...) Quite. That, quoting Churchill, is something "up with which I will not put"... (...) Saw Bicentennial Man today, it made me cry. A lot. Here's a question for you: Would you give up practical immortality in order to be officially recognised as (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

86 Messages in This Thread:


































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR