Fun : 3890


Off-Topic / Fun / 3890	3889 \| 3891

Subject:	Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date:	Wed, 29 Dec 1999 09:31:23 GMT
Viewed:	1239 times

Larry Pieniazek wrote: > James Brown wrote: > > > Doesn't that approach sacralige for a devout Larritarian like you? I mean, I > > can understand a heathen like me being irreverant, but you? You're like, the > > second disciple or something, aren't you? > > c /sacralige/sacriledge/ Or even "sacrilege." :) LFB

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
(...) While that is technically the generally accepted spelling, if I had suggested that correction, would Craigo have been able to riff on it, enabling my cliff-hanger of a riposte?? I think NOT. You mortals just don't think far enough ahead. :-) (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
(...) c /sacralige/sacriledge/ and c/irreverant/irreverent/ If you're gonna diss me, ya gotta get the details right. (25 years ago, 28-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

86 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search