Subject:
|
Re: Bicentennial Man (spoilers, and quite lengthy)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 29 Dec 1999 22:05:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1049 times
|
| |
|
|
<FnIv3w.JtC@lugnet.com> <FnIvDJ.Kvp@lugnet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Of course, the short story *I* remember was called the "Sesquicentennial Man"
(150 years).
Dave Schuler wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John DiRienzo writes:
> > Because of your description of this movie, I have made plans to go see
> > it. Your "scathing" review has interested me in something I would have
> > skipped, so thanks Dave!. It sounds typical of movies, to leave much of the
> > story out, so should I read it first? I think I did 12 years ago. Maybe
> > thats why Larry could sense the characterization that didn't actually occur
> > in the film. On that note, I often enjoy sucky movies when I have already
> > read (and enjoyed) the book they are based on.
>
> The short story is among my favorites in any genre, so I recommend it
> whether you plan to see the film or not. I confess that I don't see how
> characterization that isn't in a film can affect the film, except by its
> absence, regardless of its presence or absence from other media. I'm sure
> there are some who've enjoyed the movie, and more power to them! For me,
> though, it falls short of what the original story could have been.
>
> Dave!
--
| Tom Stangl, Technical Support Netscape Communications Corp
| Please do not associate my personal views with my employer
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
86 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
