Subject:
|
Re: Lord of the Rings
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Sun, 18 Jul 1999 04:59:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
762 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, John Neal writes:
> Sproaticus wrote:
> > Pete Postlethwaite. He was the cliche hunter guy in the Lost World. Good
> > actor, terrible movie.
> Wow. I loved it. 'Course, I read Jurassic Park years before it became a
> movie, and Lost World.
I kinda liked the book (loved JP), but I saw the movie first, and what a bad
first impression. The good guys were making mistakes no sane person would
make, half the movie was obviously filmed to sell the toys, the physics were
all bad, what the *#@$ happened to the crew of the ship, yadda yadda yadda,
bad film. :-,
Barbara's got a theory, which I buy into -- one big reason Speilberg made the
Lost World is to put in the scenes that weren't filmed for JP -- e.g. the
waterfall.
> I'd think living in Utah you'd be a little more sympathetic to our
> extinct friends;-)
Don't they prefer to be called Limestone Americans? ;-)
Cheers,
- jsproat
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Lord of the Rings
|
| (...) ~~~...~~~ ??? Wow. I loved it. 'Course, I read Jurassic Park years before it became a movie, and Lost World. Movies can't do justice to the books on which they are based [1], but they do a good job of graphically portraying the characters, (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
69 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
