To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 2298
2297  |  2299
Subject: 
Re: Lord of the Rings
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Sun, 18 Jul 1999 07:39:34 GMT
Viewed: 
1649 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Terry Keller writes:
> On Sun, 18 Jul 1999 03:44:28 GMT, "Sproaticus" <jsproat@io.com> wrote:
> > In lugnet.general, Tom McDonald writes:
> > > I don't think we came up with a good Aragorn protrayed by any
> > > working actor, though we tossed around a few ideas.
> > Pete Postlethwaite.  He was the cliche hunter guy in the Lost World.  Good
> > actor, terrible movie.
> You mean the guy who wanted to waive his fee and instead take a trophy T-Rex?
> That guy most definately is *not* my impression of Aragorn.  Wrong look,
> attitude, and age.

Well, put hair on his head.  :-,  He's got the look of someone who's
being driven by something in his past, something haunting him...  I dunno how
he'd do with a sword in hand though.  Aragorn needs to be able to handle a
sword.  And Aragorn's actor absolutely needs to carry that scene where he bids
farewell to Boromir.  This scene will make or break the character.

> > > We completely drew a blank with Gollum.
> > Leonardo DiCaprio?  :-P  Or perhaps Gene Wilder...
> They need a small, weasely type.

Aren't either of these weasly enough?  How about that first one?  :-D

Seriously, I think Gene would give gobs of good (for the audience) character
to Gollum.  Ooh!  Ooh!  Mel Brooks!

> > Glenn Close as Galadriel and Uma Thurman as Eowyn.
> But please, no Uma.  I never saw what made her so popular.

For me, it's always been Penn Jilette ooh-ing and ahh-ing over her in the back
of PC Computing.

> > That does it.  I'm OUTTA UTAH come 2002!  :-,
> The Committee will probably be glad to hear that.  Might even add it to the
> promotional literature.  :-P

ouch!  :-,

Cheers,
- jsproat



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Lord of the Rings
 
(...) That guy just seems to old. Did Aragorn have a beard? I always seem to picture him with a beard. (...) Weasely yes, but too large. Besides, we wouldn't want all the teenage girls to be falling in love with Gollum. (...) Oh please! That's just (...) (27 years ago, 18-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lord of the Rings
 
(...) You mean the guy who wanted to waive his fee and instead take a trophy T-Rex? That guy most definately is *not* my impression of Aragorn. Wrong look, attitude, and age. (...) They need a small, weasely type. Maybe the guy who played 'little (...) (27 years ago, 18-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

69 Messages in This Thread:
























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR