To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 2298
2297  |  2299
Subject: 
Re: Lord of the Rings
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Sun, 18 Jul 1999 07:39:34 GMT
Viewed: 
651 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Terry Keller writes:
On Sun, 18 Jul 1999 03:44:28 GMT, "Sproaticus" <jsproat@io.com> wrote:
In lugnet.general, Tom McDonald writes:
I don't think we came up with a good Aragorn protrayed by any
working actor, though we tossed around a few ideas.
Pete Postlethwaite.  He was the cliche hunter guy in the Lost World.  Good
actor, terrible movie.
You mean the guy who wanted to waive his fee and instead take a trophy T-Rex?
That guy most definately is *not* my impression of Aragorn.  Wrong look,
attitude, and age.

Well, put hair on his head.  :-,  He's got the look of someone who's
being driven by something in his past, something haunting him...  I dunno how
he'd do with a sword in hand though.  Aragorn needs to be able to handle a
sword.  And Aragorn's actor absolutely needs to carry that scene where he bids
farewell to Boromir.  This scene will make or break the character.

We completely drew a blank with Gollum.
Leonardo DiCaprio?  :-P  Or perhaps Gene Wilder...
They need a small, weasely type.

Aren't either of these weasly enough?  How about that first one?  :-D

Seriously, I think Gene would give gobs of good (for the audience) character
to Gollum.  Ooh!  Ooh!  Mel Brooks!

Glenn Close as Galadriel and Uma Thurman as Eowyn.
But please, no Uma.  I never saw what made her so popular.

For me, it's always been Penn Jilette ooh-ing and ahh-ing over her in the back
of PC Computing.

That does it.  I'm OUTTA UTAH come 2002!  :-,
The Committee will probably be glad to hear that.  Might even add it to the
promotional literature.  :-P

ouch!  :-,

Cheers,
- jsproat



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Lord of the Rings
 
(...) That guy just seems to old. Did Aragorn have a beard? I always seem to picture him with a beard. (...) Weasely yes, but too large. Besides, we wouldn't want all the teenage girls to be falling in love with Gollum. (...) Oh please! That's just (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lord of the Rings
 
(...) You mean the guy who wanted to waive his fee and instead take a trophy T-Rex? That guy most definately is *not* my impression of Aragorn. Wrong look, attitude, and age. (...) They need a small, weasely type. Maybe the guy who played 'little (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

69 Messages in This Thread:
























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR