To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 2376
2375  |  2377
Subject: 
Re: Lord of the Rings
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Mon, 26 Jul 1999 16:28:31 GMT
Viewed: 
965 times
  
On Mon, 19 Jul 1999 19:41:44 GMT, "Tom McDonald"
<radiotitan@spamcake.yahoo.com> wrote:

I sure am glad I wasn't drinking anything when I read that line. How would you
spell that sound of water being sputted all over a computer monitor?

W[1]|N>K.

[1] Water.

Explanation? Water Through Nose To Keyboard. Letters obvious, other
symbols are unix pipe commands.

Michael Keaton for Tom Bombadil?

I believe the Tom Bombadil scene is going to be absent from the movie,
as it should be given that we're dealing with time, money, and
attention span problems here. Cutting the Bombadil scene has no effect
on the rest of the story.

In theory polygamy sounds intriguing, but when I really think about it, I just
get plain tired. Plus I have to remember at least two anniversaries..

Just remember that it would also be legal the other way around.
"Honey, how do you feel about adding another husband to our trieste?"

It might be a hell of a lot easier to do away with (state-sanctioned)
marriage altogether, and just let everyone decide on their own how
they wish to live.

No doubt. Local reporters were probably JUI (journalizing under the
influence).

Glad _I_ wasn't eating anything at the time..

Jasper



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Lord of the Rings
 
(...) Somebody else to take some of the heat. Now does that then mean half as much heat or TWICE as much? (...) Something along the lines of an X-year contract with renewal options. That way if the marriage fades you don't renew. The End. But don't (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lord of the Rings
 
(...) how (...) Neeson (...) Mmm, yeah I could see that, except for the height. And he'd probably soak up too much $$. Like he did in Braveheart as William Wallet. We'd probably have to get someone "undiscovered" for this role. (...) Which movies (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

69 Messages in This Thread:
























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR