Subject:
|
Re: Lord of the Rings
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Tue, 27 Jul 1999 17:28:05 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
S.A.CAMPBELL@LARC.NASAantispam.GOV
|
Viewed:
|
874 times
|
| |
|
|
Jasper Janssen wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Jul 1999 19:41:44 GMT, "Tom McDonald"
> <radiotitan@spamcake.yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > In theory polygamy sounds intriguing, but when I really think about it, I just
> > get plain tired. Plus I have to remember at least two anniversaries..
>
> Just remember that it would also be legal the other way around.
> "Honey, how do you feel about adding another husband to our trieste?"
Somebody else to take some of the heat. Now does that then mean half as
much heat or TWICE as much?
>
> It might be a hell of a lot easier to do away with (state-sanctioned)
> marriage altogether, and just let everyone decide on their own how
> they wish to live.
Something along the lines of an X-year contract with renewal options.
That way if the marriage fades you don't renew. The End.
But don't tell my wife I said that...
SteveC
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Lord of the Rings
|
| (...) W[1]|N>K. [1] Water. Explanation? Water Through Nose To Keyboard. Letters obvious, other symbols are unix pipe commands. (...) I believe the Tom Bombadil scene is going to be absent from the movie, as it should be given that we're dealing with (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
69 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
