Subject:
|
Re: Rückkehr der Raumnazin
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 Jan 2006 16:11:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2696 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
You make this sound like an everyday occurrence. We have done this to some,
but the fact is that their religion doesn’t really enter in to it, but
rather their actions.
|
So why do you call them
“islamo-fascists”, and not “alleged terrorists”????
|
I was speaking specifically about the people who are incarcerated. The purpose
of their detention is what they’ve done, not what they believe (although it
is the motivation behind what they did). So my point was that we do not simply
detain anyone who happens to be Muslim because they are Muslim, but because
they have done something that threatens our country and they happen to be
Muslim. Big difference.
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Rückkehr der Raumnazin
|
| (...) But that's the whole problem. The only evidence we have that these detainees are terrorists is, basically, Dubya's assertion that they're terrorists. They're denied all due process and access to lawyers, and in many cases they've been held for (...) (18 years ago, 2-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
65 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
