To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 27441
27440  |  27442
Subject: 
Re: Rückkehr der Raumnazin
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 24 Dec 2005 16:41:06 GMT
Viewed: 
2352 times
  
I think we pretty much agree about the differences in attitude to capital punishment so... --SNIP--
  
  
  
   I can think of many similar examples such as the considered merit of social-democratic economic models (considered highly important by most Scandinavians) and the importance of privacy (quite different views between Anglophone nations and European nations for the most part).

Personally, I’m for what works. Socialism, Communism, Totalitarianism don’t work. Our system, though far from perfect, is far superior [1] to any other iteration thus far implimented.

JOHN

[1] In terms of economic power, military power, scientific breakthroughs, productivity, among others.

That’s an interesting analysis and doesn’t really argue against what I was saying (some could tenuously argue it supports my point).

To keep with your off topic argument though: Arguing that socialism doesn’t work is a patently false argument. For example, the USA has the worlds least efficient health care service even though it is largely based around a capitalist system.

All I hear about is waiting lists for transplants, etc. in countries with socialized medicine. The rich come here to have their cake and have it transplanted, too.

All I hear about the USAs medical system is people dying on the street or in ambulances waiting to find a hospital to save their life. This is more a representation of media selection than an accurate snapshot of a countries medical system. Some rich Americans go to countries like Australia or the UK for specialist operations too so it’s not a one way feed.

   If we weren’t a safety net for socialist societies’ shortcomings, there would have been hell to pay long ago.

I’ve heard this argument before and it ignores both the massive contribution to medicine of doctors from State-run medical systems (most notably Australia, France and the UK) and the fact that a lot of medical research in the US is State-funded (through university grants). Overall, I call BS on it.

   That is not to say that our system is perfect. Far from it. But it is the best in the world IMO. Bottom line is that I would rather have a doctor operate on me who has an incentive to do a good job, rather than one who doesn’t.

I would rather have doctors who are working on their own merit, rather than how much money their parents could afford to use to send them to medical school. You’ll also find that the pay rate for good doctors is quite high under most State-run medical systems.

For a market economy to work properly it needs a free flow of goods (in this case intelligent minds) and readily available information. Since the former is unavailable to the same extent in a capitalist medical system and the latter is unavailable in any medical system, I would favour a centrally controlled system run by experts.

  
   Likewise highly socialist Norway is a richer country on just about any system of measurement than the USA.

Please. Norway is living in a fantasy world. When their golden goose runs dry (hmmm, mixed metaphors:-) they are literally going to be in a world of hurt.

I take it you know don’t know much about Norway then. I think you’ll find that it is quite prepared for when the oil runs out.

  
   But then, maybe socialism only works in some countries and not others.

Only those who have unlimited resources at their disposal?

It certainly helps but isn’t neccessary. I think you’ll find that the Scandinavian countries tend to have robust economies under a socialist system and they don’t have a great deal of natural resources (excepting Norway) compared to countries like the USA or Australia.

I agree that the USA probably wouldn’t run so well under such a system. Which of course goes back to my original argument that different ideas have different merit in different countries.

   And, of course, customers who are willing to pay $$$ for their golden eggs....

JOHN

I think you might be confusing Socialism with Communism here. Socialism operates within a capitalist system and thus allows for such customers.

Tim



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Rückkehr der Raumnazin
 
Hello! (...) They probably are already breeding an army in order to invade Nigeria or Venezuela to get their oil. As for the original topic of this thread: I just wanted to know what makes "Nazi" fascinating for you. ("you" as in a general "you", (...) (19 years ago, 28-Dec-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Rückkehr der Raumnazin
 
(...) It is currently a state issue, not a federal one. Some states have the death penalty, some don't (16 of 50 don't I believe). (...) I only mention it to illustrate how hard it is to get a response on the death penalty were one to try and take a (...) (19 years ago, 24-Dec-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

65 Messages in This Thread:


















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR