Subject:
|
Re: Some other perspectives on the tragedy
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 13 Sep 2001 11:14:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
504 times
|
| |
|
|
Erik Olson wrote:
> I believe the concepts that should guide America's response are: deterrence,
> and anti-appeasement.
>
> There has been too much appeasement of terrorists by the US, and perhaps
> other countries. No retribution was ever exacted for the USS Cole attack,
> because we insist on this policy of bringing individual terrorists to
> justice (as if they were in an American courtroom.) This kind of appeasement
> encourages more attacks. It must stop.
>
> Deterrence means: Anyone who has declared that they have the intention, and
> the means, to attack Americans should be the targets of retribution. That
> includes any of bin Laden's troopers, and any other terrorist organization
> known to be operating against America, whether they participated in this
> week's attack or not. Take them all down. Otherwise, they will make the next
> move. Justice calls for sufficient deadly force to be used against known
> terrorist organizations. If other deaths are unavoidable, so be it. No
> terrorists would feel sorry about doing it to us.
exactly. well said.
Dan
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Some other perspectives on the tragedy
|
| I'm going into Manhattan now. I've been working most of the night on my little part of restoring normalcy. I'm seething mad this morning. Who is my anger directed against? It's not directed at my Muslim co-workers, whom I expect to have lunch with, (...) (23 years ago, 13-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
66 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
