| |
In lugnet.trains.org, Steve Chapple writes:
> In lugnet.trains.org, Reinhard "Ben" Beneke writes:
> > In lugnet.trains.org, Larry Pieniazek writes:
>
> <snip>
> > We always have had layouts with lots of ramps and bridges.
>
> Quite right - as you should. Are we the only two here (now that Matt
> isn't around much) who think (of train layouts) in three dimensions? 8-)
I think in 3 dimensions too but on a plywooder layout with no terrain, a
bunch of ramps and bridges tend to make things look more toylike unless
there is some clear justification for the bridges (to cross over another
line for a plausible reason)...
terrain makes much else more possible and realistic. But terrain costs a lot.
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Show report
|
| (...) <snip> (...) Quite right - as you should. Are we the only two here (now that Matt isn't around much) who think (of train layouts) in three dimensions? 8-) (...) I was planning to use multiple gapped controllers at Supertrain2001, but hadn't (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
