| |
In lugnet.trains.org, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.trains.org, John Matthews writes:
> > Larry Pieniazek <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message
> > > Mine are huge (12x16hundred) so will be a lot slower to view. I just
> > > uploaded a big zip and it failed to work so I have to do it image by
> > > image.
> > That would be your first clue that these images are *way* too big for most
> > folks.
>
> Since I haven't sat down and figured out how to automatically resize and
> rename a bunch of pictures at once inside of the tool I use, the time to
> reformat all of them wasn't available to me. So it came down to those or
> none. I chose those rather than none.
>
> Since you have thumbnails to choose from, you only pay the price for ones
> you want to see. Since other people uploaded smaller ones, you don't have to
> look at mine at all if large images get you all annoyed.
>
> I could see a basis for your carping if I was the only source. But I wasn't.
And in case it's not apparant, Lar - some folks appreciate your larger pics,
so please don't assume from the negative comments that its not worth the
effort - it is.
Thanks,
James
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Show report
|
| (...) Since I haven't sat down and figured out how to automatically resize and rename a bunch of pictures at once inside of the tool I use, the time to reformat all of them wasn't available to me. So it came down to those or none. I chose those (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.trains, lugnet.town)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
