Subject:
|
Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Fri, 28 Jun 2002 16:37:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2041 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.publish, Constantine Hannaher writes:
> In lugnet.publish, Oliver Kutsche writes:
> > "Constantine Hannaher" <channaher@netscape.net> wrote in
> > news:GyFAJB.490@lugnet.com...
> > > I completely did not grasp that there was anything LEGO about the image • other
> > > than the blatant use of the red box trademark in the corner, to the extent • that
> > > I went searching for a cooperative venture between the ice cream • manufacturer
> > > and LEGO.
> >
> > Look closer. The ice cream is made of bricks. If we were only allowed to
> > give each picture a comment I would have written that..
> >
> >
> > ..oli
>
> Or if you had uploaded at least one image of the MOC by itself, instead of
> inside a derivative work (term of art in the copyright field)...
I must agree with Oliver on this point: the MOC would completely lose its
interest if not inserted in the picture. I had the chance to see (and download)
the manipulated ad, and quite frankly I can't see why everyone is so
concerned... It is highly unlikely the Ice cream company will feel their brand
was in any way hurt.
FTR, I just clicked on the thumb because I knew the Ice cream name, and got
puzzled as to what the LEGO logo was doing on the ad. It was a nice surprise to
see the manipulation, very nice indeed. And I must confess it took me a while
to figure out the "brickalization" of the Ice cream... :-)
Would you give the proper value to this creation if you didn't know what was
behind it? Would you have clicked on a thumb depicting a quasi-rectangular
brown shape?
Pedro
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
| (...) download) (...) to (...) Let's try that again: Or if you had uploaded at least one image of the _(_MOC by itself_)_, [instead of] _in addition to its placement_ inside a derivative work (term of art in the copyright field)... On the other (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
| | | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
| (...) You cannot say that for sure. (...) My main concern and why I kept voting "unsure" was that this parody has the LEGO(r) logo on it. I really don't want to see a huge debate break out about this. It's been discussed in some depth before that (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
| (...) That is not true, and is the point of my posting at all. I did see this image in the recent folder at Brickshelf yesterday. It was public. This has more to do with Brickshelf than with you... (...) Or if you had uploaded at least one image of (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
85 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
