 | | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
|
(...) I must agree with Oliver on this point: the MOC would completely lose its interest if not inserted in the picture. I had the chance to see (and download) the manipulated ad, and quite frankly I can't see why everyone is so concerned... It is (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
|
(...) download) (...) to (...) Let's try that again: Or if you had uploaded at least one image of the _(_MOC by itself_)_, [instead of] _in addition to its placement_ inside a derivative work (term of art in the copyright field)... On the other (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
|
(...) That I do understand, and agree. As an addition, it would definately make sense. (...) Yes, I realized that when I hit post - I keep forgetting LEGO is very brand-aware... :-) It might have been advisable to include a disclaimer, in tiny (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
|
(...) You cannot say that for sure. (...) My main concern and why I kept voting "unsure" was that this parody has the LEGO(r) logo on it. I really don't want to see a huge debate break out about this. It's been discussed in some depth before that (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
|
(...) <SNIP> (...) <SNIP> Sorry to nit-pick, and maybe I'm just badgering the point, and maybe the images were changed before they were uploaded. But the enhanced image that I saw (as I did not look at these images until after they were re-uploaded) (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
|
(...) Yes you are, and yes they were. The original image had the LEGO logo in it not a parody. But even the parody is a technical violation of the fairplay document... one that lots of people do (similar parodies or distortions that is) but a (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
|
(...) Lar, Less typing, more clicking. I want everyone to be able to see my pics soon. ;-) Jude FUT .o-t.debate cause it ain't worth it even though you are right (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
|
(...) Why would a company feel upset about free advertising? I mean, it is not as if the picture was in any way an insult to the ice-cream... I agree I cannot tell for sure that they *won't* feel hurt, but what I said is *it is unlikely* they'll (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
|
In lugnet.publish, Pedro Silva writes: <snip> That's all plowed ground, I am not going to debate it here. (...) If I understand your question the answer of late is: Orbital - 2 Chemical Brothers - Exit Planet Dust Paul Oakenfold - Tranceport or (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
|
(...) I did not know that - please apologize the persistence :-( (...) Huh... rythm, as in "the average pace in which you (reviewer) review files". I should have used "review" instead of "analysis", but the first does not exist in my native language (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
|
(...) Ah. OK. The answer is it depends. External factors: How fast does the page load? That's driven by the network load. I have a cable modem connection to the internet and a 100 Mbps internal network. During the day the network is loaded because (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
|
(...) Careful... How do you know that the name at the top of the folder is the person who uploaded each file? KL (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
|
(...) Um, I'm assuming that I found the right person by looking their name up, and I'm walking their tree. If the folders I see there when I start don't match up with what I expect to see (because I know who they are and what they put there (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
|
(...) Since your doing some mammoth overhaul on Brickshelf right now, I was wondering if you could implement a new browsing feature: by member number. Is there some sort of privacy policy that would break if it was available? I know I would be using (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
