Subject:
|
Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Fri, 28 Jun 2002 17:34:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2192 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.publish, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.publish, Pedro Silva writes:
<SNIP>
> My main concern and why I kept voting "unsure" was that this parody has the
> LEGO(r) logo on it.
<SNIP>
Sorry to nit-pick, and maybe I'm just badgering the point, and maybe the images
were changed before they were uploaded. But the enhanced image that I saw (as
I did not look at these images until after they were re-uploaded) makes me
think that they have not been changed, except for the image labled 'for
blinds.' It seems the creator wanted to make sure that everyone was aware that
the LEGO logo was in fact NOT in the picture, but a parody of the LEGO logo,
with the word LOGO written in.
--Anthony
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
| (...) Yes you are, and yes they were. The original image had the LEGO logo in it not a parody. But even the parody is a technical violation of the fairplay document... one that lots of people do (similar parodies or distortions that is) but a (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
| (...) You cannot say that for sure. (...) My main concern and why I kept voting "unsure" was that this parody has the LEGO(r) logo on it. I really don't want to see a huge debate break out about this. It's been discussed in some depth before that (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
85 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
