Subject:
|
Re: Questions about fan involvement with TLC
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:22:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2148 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, David Koudys wrote:
> In lugnet.general, C. L. GunningCook wrote:
snipped
> > [In particular, to Calum, no, I don't think that any of my
> > questions/answers/resulting conclusions are remotely world changing nor would
> > it be "preventing the next Nobel prize winning thesis" but... I also don't
> > recall LUGNET changing to a "World Event Symposium". Therefore ~ In my
> > opinion, company and fan relations are a valid part of discussion here.]
>
> Is it me or are many people 'going underground' where discussions on LUGNET are
> concerned?
YES, yes they are! Which is how all of this sort of got started.
> I mean, I've received a few e-mails lately regarding some of my
> posts to various threads--either stating that they agree with what I stated or
> more often stating that I should go crawl under a rock somewhere because my
> opinion isn't right.
In the past I was only getting intermittent feedback on MOCs I have posted, by
ppl that stated they were lurkers. But now... Like you, I am also getting more
and more non-MOC-post responses/feedback/concerns in my email. At first, I hope
part of it was posting issues, but after careful consideration, I see that is
not the reason.
snipped again.
> Once again I state for the record,
>
> Janey--you go girl!!
LOL, Dave... thanks for the support, maybe we can start some mutual admiration
society.
Janey "Red Brick"
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Questions about fan involvement with TLC
|
| In lugnet.general, C. L. GunningCook wrote: <snip> (...) I took your motivation as asking legitimate questions regarding a legitimate issue. (...) <snip (...) Is it me or are many people 'going underground' where discussions on LUGNET are concerned? (...) (18 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.general)
|
63 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
