Subject:
|
Re: Questions about fan involvement with TLC
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 15 Apr 2006 12:21:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2069 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, C. L. GunningCook wrote:
snip
| |
I do want to address two issues that were brought up here, some what, but
mostly in email and msn.. That basically was “What was your motivation in
posting?
|
Well my motivation was that I am under NDA and thought that perspective needed
to be heard (even if my NDA prevents me from saying very much specific).
| |
What do I think the price is?”
|
Ultimately the price will be improved relations with the LEGO company. Although
that may be at the expense of a little conversation in forums like LUGNET. I do
think as folks get more comfortable with their NDAs things will open up. In
particular the Ambassador NDA does not prevent us from participating in the
community or from discussing every topic we have discussed privately (although
most are off-limits). We are encouraged to keep our participation high. On the
other hand some NDA’s like the MUP and others require stricter secrecy in the
project they are involved in. So someone in the MUP is understandably going to
be less visible in discussions involving the RCX because they are working on an
NXT most of the time.
| |
I feel I need to make one thing clear... I never once intended or thought
this would be that earth shattering of a post, it was just some simple
questions that brought out some simple and complex answers.
|
And Thanks for asking, it was a very healthy discussion.
Eric Kingsley
LEGO Ambassador
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Questions about fan involvement with TLC
|
| (...) I don't think we can say that improved relations *is* the price we pay for the NDA and the Ambassador programs. I think it's more accurate to say that it's the *hope* and *desire* of most people, from AFOL's to the people at TLC, that the (...) (18 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.general)
| | | Re: Questions about fan involvement with TLC
|
| (...) Oops Eric, I guess sometimes I am not as clear as I should be... I meant, that people asked me those questions after my first post in this thread, and I just wanted to respond publicly, I certainly wasnt questioning the motives of any other (...) (18 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Questions about fan involvement with TLC
|
| In lugnet.general, C. L. GunningCook wrote: As a follow up... First of all I would like to thank everyone that took time to respond to my questions, it helped bring a new understanding and brought up some points I hadn't considered. I do want to (...) (18 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
63 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
