Subject:
|
Re: Ep1 peeves (includes episode 2 spoiler-maybe)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Thu, 27 May 1999 05:08:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
831 times
|
| |
|
|
Jonathan wrote:
>
> In lugnet.starwars, Todd Lehman writes:
> > In lugnet.starwars, ljorgensen@uswest.net (Lee Jorgensen) writes:
> > > <SPOILERAGE>
> > > May include book spoilerage!!!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > (hopefully this is enough)
> > I don't think they meant that there were always supposed to be exactly two
> > Sith...I think they meant that whenever there was one, there was another --
> > meaning Sith in pairs rather than alone.
> >
> > --Todd
>
> The way it's explained in the novelization of ep 1 (and may be common knowledge
> to the real SW fans) was that a billion years ago, or something, one rebel Jedi
> pulled toward the dark side, and began recruiting followers. The numbers grew
> very fast, and before long there were a couple hundred in the ranks. Then they
> all turned on each other, killing the entire group. Since then, there have been
> only and exacly two members: the master and the apprentice. I may have flubbed
> the telling of this a bit, so if anyone wants to clean it up, go right ahead.
Sounds about right to me. By the way, the line from TPM is:
Yoda: Always Two, there are. No more; no less. A Master, and an Aprentice.
--Karim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Ep1 peeves (includes episode 2 spoiler-maybe)
|
| (...) The way it's explained in the novelization of ep 1 (and may be common knowledge to the real SW fans) was that a billion years ago, or something, one rebel Jedi pulled toward the dark side, and began recruiting followers. The numbers grew very (...) (25 years ago, 27-May-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
67 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
