To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / 2544
2543  |  2545
Subject: 
Re: SW plots (Spoilers)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.starwars
Date: 
Wed, 26 May 1999 17:20:07 GMT
Reply-To: 
s.a.campbell@larc=StopSpammers=.nasa.gov
Viewed: 
810 times
  
Bram Lambrecht wrote:

"ravi & visu" <helix83@hotmail.com> writes:
(and none are anticlimatic haha)

Ep1 had tons of anti-climax, like when Jar Jar had his hand stuck in the
pod racer engine--you'd hink something would happen, put Padme just
pulled his hand out.  It made for an awfully pointless scene.
--Bram


It did give them more opportunity to have JJ say  "Muh han thuk!" which
makes kids laugh.  Kids who then buy the toys (or bug the parents to buy
the toys) of "that funny guy."  So from a marketing standpoint it was
FAR from pointless.

SteveC
Perilous Pirate Page
http://www.erols.com/litehous/index.html



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: SW plots (Spoilers)
 
On Wed, 26 May 1999 17:20:07 GMT, Steve Campbell uttered the following profundities... (...) I was rather saddened to see JJ bicycles. Sometimes marketing goes to ridiculous lenghths. (25 years ago, 28-May-99, to lugnet.starwars)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: SW plots (Spoilers)
 
(...) Ep1 had tons of anti-climax, like when Jar Jar had his hand stuck in the pod racer engine--you'd hink something would happen, put Padme just pulled his hand out. It made for an awfully pointless scene. --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o o \ (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.starwars)

67 Messages in This Thread:





























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR