Subject:
|
Re: Ep1 peeves (includes episode 2 spoiler-maybe)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Wed, 26 May 1999 16:08:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2657 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
> In lugnet.starwars, ljorgensen@uswest.net (Lee Jorgensen) writes:
> > <SPOILERAGE>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > (hopefully this is enough)
> >
> > At the end of TPM, Yoda and Mace were discussing the Sith, and I believe
> > that Yoda said "There are always two, a master and an apprentice."
> >
> > So what about the end of RotJ, where both Vader and the Emporer (I don't
> > remember his name), both die? Does this mean that the Sith are 'extinct'
> > again?
>
> I don't think they meant that there were always supposed to be exactly two
> Sith...I think they meant that whenever there was one, there was another --
> meaning Sith in pairs rather than alone.
>
> --Todd
>
> p.s. It's said that Palpatine didn't actually die at Endor and that he
> might come back in a fresh clone body later.
Unfortuantely, Lucas isn't going to do 7-9 ... :(
Nor, will he allow anyone else to do it either.
--
Lee Jorgensen, Programmer/Analyst - Bankoe Systems, Inc.
mailto:jorgensen@bankoe.moc <-- reverse moc
mailto:ljorgensen@uswest.ten <-- reverse ten
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Ep1 peeves (includes episode 2 spoiler-maybe)
|
| (...) I don't think they meant that there were always supposed to be exactly two Sith...I think they meant that whenever there was one, there was another -- meaning Sith in pairs rather than alone. --Todd p.s. It's said that Palpatine didn't (...) (27 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
67 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
