| |
Tim Courtney skrev i meddelandet
<4.2.0.58.19991127085301.00af6960@pop.osiriscomm.com>...
> At 02:57 AM 11/27/1999 , Anders Isaksson wrote:
> > Please remember that LDRAW is also a way for people to document their • models.
> > Now if I happen to have some 'Byggis' (or whatever) bricks, and they are • used
> > in a model of mine, I would like to be able to use them in my documentation • of
> > the model too. That should be _my_ decision. If there is a common place to
> > find/share such pieces, so much the better!
>
> Which leads to another question. If you make a model with Lego bricks
> mixed with Byggis [1], how will the model be identified as such, and how
> will the individual clone pieces be identified as such? Obviously someone
> with a Lego-only collection would not be able to duplicate the model and
> might not be able to figure it out.
Well, I never said anything about making the models public in .dat-format, did
I? I said _documenting_ my own work (or my kid's).
> [1] God help us never see the day ;)
I think overzealous purism is hurting the hobby more than a spurious clone
piece! BTW, if there is an Almighty God, he must have created the clones too,
right?
I must say I find this purist thing a bit hypocritical!
Happy building,
--
Anders Isaksson, Sweden
BlockCAD: http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/proglego.htm
Gallery: http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/gallery.htm
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Clone DATs--any interest?
|
| (...) Yeah, it is a very tricky subject, and could easily go either way IMO. (...) Naw, extreme is like no BURPs, CRAPPs, Town Jr. Pieces (that's not all wrong), even minifigs, like the Lego Purists' Pages. (...) Yeah. You could even go so far as to (...) (25 years ago, 27-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
64 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
