Subject:
|
Re: Clone DATs--any interest?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 30 Nov 1999 15:30:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2435 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Lars C. Hassing writes:
> Steve Bliss wrote in message ...
> > In lugnet.cad.dev, Dave Schuler wrote:
> >
> > > If I were to use a CSTUD.DAT file, what would have to be different about • it
> > > for L3P not to label it 'LEGO'? Does L3P recognize the "STUD.DAT" name and
> > > automatically append the logo? If so, would the name "CSTUD.DAT" circumvent
> > > that function? Would this be an acceptable course of action?
> >
> > I believe that would take care of the problem. CSTUD.DAT wouldn't be • recognized
> > by LDraw and LEdit as anything special--these two programs recognize files • named
> > stud*.dat as special files; LDraw substitutes stu2*.dat when the fast draw
> > option is specified. And (by default) LEdit substitutes a simple line for
> > stud*.dat primitives.
>
>
> Right, only L3P's primitive substitute for "stud.dat" contains the logo.
Would it be all right if I simply copied the STUD.DAT file to CSTUD.DAT?
More specifically, would there be any purity concerns about using the cloned
primitive?
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Clone DATs--any interest?
|
| Steve Bliss wrote in message ... (...) Right, only L3P's primitive substitute for "stud.dat" contains the logo. BTW, no-one has complained about the logos on e.g. left wings, that are implemented as a mirroring of a right wing :-) /Lars (27 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
64 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
