Subject:
|
Re: Clone DATs--any interest?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Nov 1999 15:43:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
992 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Tim Courtney writes:
> At 07:55 PM 11/23/1999 , Dave Schuler wrote:
> > Here's part of the disclaimer I've already attached in the zip-file:
> >
> > I know my efforts may seem like heresy to a number of AFOL's, and I
> > apologize for any stepped-on toes. Let me state plainly that the
> > pieces included here are ABSOLUTELY UNOFFICIAL, and should NOT UNDER
> > ANY CIRCUMSTANCES be perceived as part of the LCad Canon. My intent
> > is not to cheapen the worth of LCad, but rather to offer a few
> > overlooked pieces that fans of the "clone" brands might like to see.
> > After all, in the virtual environment, all discussions of varying
> > ABS quality between Lego and Clones become irrelevant...
>
> Good disclaimer.
Thanks! That's just part of the TXT file in the clone.dat zip package. In
addition, each individual DAT-file starts with this header:
0 MegaBloks Brick 1 x 2 with notch and 6 slots
0 Name: c010102b.dat
0 Author: Dave Schuler!
0 VERY Unofficial LCad contribution
0 (not in ANY WAY a part of the LEGO Canon!)
0 1999-11-6
The first two lines, and the date of course, vary from piece to piece, but
this way I hope that every piece will be immediately discernible as an
unofficial part.
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Clone DATs--any interest?
|
| (...) Good disclaimer. (...) Understood. (...) Its commendable what you're doing here, Dave. Its pretty controversial, and I'll be one of the first people to admit that I'm against it, but it still should be taken at face-value: a contribution. You (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
64 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
