Subject:
|
Re: Clone DATs--any interest?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 30 Nov 1999 16:05:45 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@novera.#ihatespam#com
|
Viewed:
|
940 times
|
| |
|
|
<943972405.972346@ns.cci.dk> <FM0oEv.HKM@lugnet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Dave Schuler wrote:
> Would it be all right if I simply copied the STUD.DAT file to CSTUD.DAT?
> More specifically, would there be any purity concerns about using the cloned
> primitive?
NO! If you DARE make clone parts you have to make all your own
primitives. In fact, you can't use lines either, you'll have to invent
something new. And you can just forget about using the colors either.
Did that sound silly?
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Clone DATs--any interest?
|
| Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote in message news:3843F5D9.BCB346...ger.net... (...) CSTUD.DAT? (...) cloned (...) Just be sure to change the header information (name, author, official status) in the CSTUD.DAT file. Asside from that, a copy (...) (25 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Clone DATs--any interest?
|
| (...) Here's part of the disclaimer I've already attached in the zip-file: I know my efforts may seem like heresy to a number of AFOL's, and I apologize for any stepped-on toes. Let me state plainly that the pieces included here are ABSOLUTELY (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
64 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
