Subject:
|
Re: Markets and juniorization
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 5 Dec 2001 22:42:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
739 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Bradley Dale writes:
> My big question: Why does LEGO need today's kids? What if LEGO focused on
> being such a good toy for ages 12+ that every teen and adult wanted to build
> with it? Not just adults that are currently AFOLS, but everyone! I think
> that would be really cool. Is it possible?
>
> Does LEGO really want a market that wants juniorization? :)
Well-- it's not just about money for the Lego Company. It's about their
values. I mean, if they found some new super-product that made them more
money, would they drop the Lego product and make the new one? Nah. It's just
not their particular business. Lego's focus has (very nearly) always been
kids. Not teenagers, not adults. Kids. They certainly don't turn away older
people-- but they're not the focus.
Quite frankly, I'm rather happy with most of what they've been doing lately.
The new My Own Train stuff is not very juniorized, they're offering bulk
bricks (in odd colors and pieces!), they're coming out with non-juniorized
sculptures and models (Sopwith Camel, Statue of Liberty, UCS sets), etc.
It's not their primary trade, though. It's only a minority of sets that are
geared towards adults (or teenagers) like these.
Would it be cool if they catered to us? Sure! I think so. Kids might not
though. And being that they're the both the largest source of income and
also the focal group of the company, I don't think it's gonna happen. I'm
quite content to let them cater to us as much as they can and still make a
profit on it. And if the adult market grows? Maybe they'll cater to us more.
But I don't think they'll take the focus off of kids.
DaveE
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Markets and juniorization
|
| (...) Um, yes they would. They already have. It's called Bionicle. It is so far from their core product that it's not even readily compatible. (Unless you are an adult fan of course who has some obscure Technic pieces that allow integration.) They (...) (23 years ago, 6-Dec-01, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Markets and juniorization
|
| (...) My big question: Why does LEGO need today's kids? What if LEGO focused on being such a good toy for ages 12+ that every teen and adult wanted to build with it? Not just adults that are currently AFOLS, but everyone! I think that would be (...) (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.general)
|
60 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
