To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 34305
34304  |  34306
Subject: 
Re: Question: Does the market realy want junorization?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Wed, 5 Dec 2001 17:29:21 GMT
Viewed: 
696 times
  
In lugnet.general, John Neal writes:
In lugnet.general, Jonathan Wilson writes:
Lego keeps saying that junorization is what todays video-game kids want
but is it really true?

<snip>

I've got to give TLC credit where it is due, because juniorization is working
very well.  Look at the success of Bionicle-- that is a *totally* juniorized
line IMO.  For a builder such as I, Bionicle is a nightmare because virtually
every piece in the line is unusable.

I agree with this entirely, and my own son, who shares with me tens of
thousands of regular (ie stackable, if not rectilinear) bricks, _loves_
Bionicles, and has asked for nothing else (lego-wise) for Christmas.

He has a separate container for minifigs and their acessories, and prefers
to play with them alone on the barest of play surfaces, or once-made and
never-broken-down sets. He likes to _collect_ special pieces, such as
crystals, animals, weapons, cameras and so on. The HP sets are _wonderful_
for this purpose, and I prefer to get him these over Bionicles.

  But it's successful, and, generally
speaking, what's good for TLC is good for us.


Well, as long as TLC continue to offer traditional bricks in a variety of
colours, or sets which use these.

I think there is a market, say age 14 and up, who would want highly detailed
sets like the SW x-wing, tie interceptor, and blockade runner, or the
technic supercars for instance. When I hit that age, the first of the
technic cars were coming out, and, even though I didn't get any (darn you,
my parents), it lkept my interest in the toy high.


It's not a question of what a broad sampling wants. Do you *want* Primo or
Duplo?  *Personally* I don't, but should I be calling for its demise?  Of course
not, because it has a niche (of which I happen to not be a part).

I agree here, too. I believe getting kids interested in the building process
early makes them life-long builders. My son builds MOCs tentatively, but I
don't think he'll ever _stop_ at this point.


<snip>

stuart



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Question: Does the market realy want junorization?
 
(...) The success of Bionicle is not the success of LEGO. It is the success of a line that is closer to action figures than building bricks. It's a sad day, not one to celebrate. (...) Do I read you correctly? You're saying he's asked for nothing (...) (23 years ago, 6-Dec-01, to lugnet.general)  

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Question: Does the market realy want junorization?
 
(...) But you just said yourself why juniorization is here-- because of video game kids with short attention spans. So your little experiment should be *against* a video game (use any LEGO set you want. The idea is to get the kid *playing* with the (...) (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.general)

60 Messages in This Thread:

























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR